(a) the Court had jurisdiction to grant any relief or
remedy or do any other thing by way of writ, whether of prohibition, mandamus,
certiorari or of any other description, or
(b) in any proceedings in the
Court for any relief or remedy any writ might have issued out of the Court for
the purpose of the commencement or conduct of the proceedings, or otherwise in
relation to the proceedings, whether the writ might have issued pursuant to
any rule or order of the Court or of course,
(c) the Court shall continue to have jurisdiction to grant that
relief or remedy or to do that thing; but
(d) shall not issue any such writ,
and
(e) shall grant that relief or remedy or do that thing by way of judgment
or order under this Act and the rules, and
(f) proceedings for that relief or
remedy or for the doing of that thing shall be in accordance with this Act and
the rules.
(2) Subject to the rules, this section does not apply to--
(a) the
writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum,
(b) any writ of execution for the
enforcement of a judgment or order of the Court, or
(c) any writ in aid of
any such writ of execution.
(3) The jurisdiction of the Court to grant any
relief or remedy in the nature of a writ of certiorari includes, if the Court
is satisfied that the ultimate determination of a court or tribunal in any
proceedings has been made on the basis of an error of law that appears on the
face of the record of the proceedings--
(a) jurisdiction to quash the ultimate
determination of the court or tribunal, and
(b) if the Court determines that,
as a matter of law, only one particular determination should have been made by
the court or tribunal, jurisdiction to make such judgment or orders as are
required for the purpose of finally determining the proceedings.
(4) For the
purposes of subsection (3), the face of the record includes the reasons
expressed by the court or tribunal for its ultimate determination.
(5)
Subsections (3) and (4) do not affect the operation of any legislative
provision to the extent to which the provision is, according to common law
principles and disregarding those subsections, effective to prevent the Court
from exercising its powers to quash or otherwise review a decision.
